PDF Research Universal Publishing Design...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Future...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
![]() |
"By 2004, the pile of information on your desk will be 30 percent paper and 70 percent electronic, compared to 90 percent paper today." Dr. Keith T. Davidson, |
|
HTML |
PDF |
||
|
Good |
Cross-platform, relatively fast, searchable, hyperlinks |
Good |
Cross-platform, relatively fast, searchable, hyperlinks |
|
Bad |
Language "held hostage" in browser wars |
Better |
Browser independent and backward compatible with previous versions |
|
Ugly 1 |
Layout is subject to unpredictable client settings |
Best 1 |
Client settings does not affect layout |
|
Ugly 2 |
Layout tools are coarse and quirky |
Best 2 |
Layout tools are user's choice - the best that have been developed in DTP |
|
Ugly 3 |
Terrible typesetting - one font,client defined |
Best 3 |
Fonts are embedded - all layout and typesetting is retained |
|
Ugly 4 |
Is not WYSIWYG - Color palette compatibility problems |
Best 4 |
Is WYSIWYG - On-screen, cross platform proofing is excellent - color is not an issue |
|
Ugly 5 |
No vector support - not scalable on-screen and terrible printing |
Best 5 |
Total vector support - scalable on-screen and great printing |
|
|
|
For another comparison of formats, visit InfoCon America's comparison of PDF against printing and non-PDF formats (i.e. SGML tagging, HTML).
|
a production of Performance Graphics ©1998 The Miller De Wulf Corporation |